Team Performance Snapshot

Key Insights

• Jacksonville’s attack leaned heavily toward playmaking rather than pure finishing. Most of the top producers sit below the diagonal line, indicating significantly more assists than goals. This reflects a puck-movement oriented offense with shared creation responsibilities.

• Craig Martin was the clear offensive engine. His combination of 19 assists and 20 goals made him the most balanced and dangerous scorer on the roster, standing out as the only player essentially matching elite playmaking with elite finishing.

• Bennett MacArthur functioned primarily as a setup forward. With very high assist totals relative to goals, he appears to have been one of the club’s primary facilitators and transition creators rather than a volume finisher.

• Matteo Costantini and Patrick Bajkov added secondary offensive depth. Both contributed strong assist totals, though Bajkov’s relatively low goal count compared to assists suggests he played more of a distributor role.

• The defensive group provided modest but useful offense. Taos Jordan stood out among defensemen with strong assist production and above-average goal scoring for a blueliner, while Peter Tischke and Aidan Fulp chipped in secondary offense.

• Jacksonville’s lower-end scorers were clustered tightly together. Many players around the bottom-left quadrant had limited offensive production, suggesting the Icemen relied heavily on their top unit rather than deep scoring throughout the lineup.

• The roster profile reflects a structured offensive system. Rather than relying on one pure sniper, Jacksonville spread puck movement and possession responsibilities across several forwards, with multiple players contributing assists at high rates.

• The chart suggests strong offensive chemistry among the top six forwards. Several players accumulated assist-heavy stat lines simultaneously, which often indicates stable line combinations and coordinated puck distribution rather than isolated individual scoring.

Team Season in Review Dashboard

Key Insights

• Jacksonville built its identity around defense and structure rather than offensive firepower. The Icemen sit in the lower-left quadrant of the identity map, indicating both below-average scoring and strong goals-against suppression. Their defensive profile was one of the better marks in the ECHL.

• The club succeeded by limiting chances and controlling game pace. Jacksonville’s low goals-against rate suggests disciplined defensive-zone coverage, strong team structure, and effective goaltending support rather than high-event hockey.

• Craig Martin drove the offense. He led the team with 39 points and stood out as Jacksonville’s most complete offensive player, combining scoring touch with playmaking ability while also finishing near even in plus/minus.

• Bennett MacArthur was a major setup presence. His high point total paired with a positive plus/minus suggests he contributed offensively without sacrificing defensive responsibility.

• Patrick Bajkov provided efficient secondary offense. Despite a negative plus/minus, he generated strong point production and likely filled a more offensively aggressive role, potentially in power-play situations.

• Taos Jordan was an impactful two-way defenseman. He combined strong offensive production from the blue line with one of the better plus/minus ratings among Jacksonville skaters, making him one of the club’s most valuable all-around contributors.

• Depth scoring dropped off quickly after the top group. Beyond the top four or five scorers, offensive totals declined substantially, reinforcing the idea that Jacksonville relied on structure and efficiency more than overwhelming offensive depth.

• Goaltending was steady across multiple netminders. Cameron Rowe handled the largest workload and maintained a solid save percentage around .900, while Scott Ratzlaff posted the best save percentage in lighter action. Michael Bullion also provided dependable support in a secondary role.

• The Icemen profile resembles a classic playoff-style team. Strong defensive metrics, balanced goaltending, and controlled offensive contributions suggest a club designed to win low-scoring, structured games rather than track meets.